🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."