🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed order, the nation's top court cleared the way for Texas to employ a redrawn congressional map that could add as many as five new Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, issued on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to lift a district court's ruling that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and upsetting the delicate balance of power in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably sorted voters by their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the boundaries. It had mandated the state to employ the districts drawn after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

Through a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, pointing out that its ruling was actually authored by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The court's action occurs during a national contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to alter the U.S. House map to protect a fragile Republican control. Typically, redistricting takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add a number of more GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation aligned with his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic officials lamented the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party election organization.

Another leading Democratic leader said the court had another time shredded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he concluded.